The Holy Land Principles for US Companies — Campaign for Fair Employment in Israel and Palestine
Posted on December 2, 2014 by Hank Boerner – Chair & Chief Strategist#Apartheid #Apartheid system #Cardinal Resources #Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli #Corning #enax Therapeutics #Father Sean McManus #GE #General Electric #Harrington Investments #Holy Land Principles #Inc. #Intel #Irish National Caucus #Jim Boyle #MacBride Principles #New York State Common Fund #Northern Ireland #Oxygen Therapeutics #Palestine #President Barack Obama #President Bill Clinton; US Senator Bob Dole; NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani; NYS Governor Mario Cuomo; Boston Mayor Raymond Flynn #President Harry S Truman #State of Israel #t
by Hank Boerner – Chairman G&A Institute
Important note: We published this on 2 December…please note in third and fourth paragraphs important clarifications as of 4 December based on input from Father Sean McManus.
Investors and companies will be keeping watch on a new campaign gaining momentum that is advocating for fair employment policies and practices by US companies doing business in Israel and Palestine.
At the center of the campaign are the Holy Land Principles for companies doing business there.
Clarification: All 546 U.S. companies doing business in Israel and/or Palestine are receiving communications from the Principles advocates. The package sent to CEOs included a “pamphlet” with and other background on the issue along with a copy of organizer Father Sean McManus’s updated memoir, “My American Struggle for Justice in Northern Ireland…and the Holy land.”
To date, three U.S public companies — Intel, GE and Corning — have received shareholder resolutions urging the companies to sign on to the Principles on behalf of the Holy Land Principles organizers for 2015 shareholder votes. The filers are Harrington Investors ((Intel); Cardinal Resources (General Electric); Corning (Jim Boyle).
This campaign is reminiscent of two prior successful investor and advocate campaigns: the struggle to eliminate South Africa’s official Apartheid policies and structured discrimination practices, and the campaign to end anti-Catholic worker discrimination practices in Northern Ireland. Both campaigns involved corporate fair employment issues in those countries.
This new campaign may touch some nerves of people on hearing the news because it may appear to be political — but the organizers stress that only one issue is involved: fair employment by US companies. Global or domestic politics aside, the campaign organizers say that this is the most basic, proper thing for American investors to be concerned about.
And, they stress, this is an American campaign, not a Palestinian or Israel campaign. and is restricted to employment conditions in the Holy Land — universally called that because it is home to three of the world’s major faiths — Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
The Principles campaign is centered on inviting American companies operating in the Holy Land to sign on to the Holy Land Principles — it is essential to note up front that the Principles do not call for quotas, reverse discrimination, dis-investment, divestment, or boycotts.
There are important precedents for this type of issue advocacy campaign. US companies operating in South Africa and later, Northern Ireland were pressured over years in focused campaigns by investors, issue advocates and a number of US governmental jurisdictions to embrace fair employment practices in those countries.
In focusing on the policies of US companies doing business in Israel and Palestine, of course there may be sensitive issues raised (political, statecraft, religious, ethnic, etc. ). This is understandable; we offer some background may help to put the campaign in context.
Background to help in understanding the Holy Land Principles:
The Holy Land is spiritual home to three of the world’s great monotheistic religious: in order of evolvement, Judaism, Christianity, Islam.
It is ironic to think that for hundreds of years, yea, for millennia, this relatively tiny land at the eastern edge of the larger Middle East region [that] is considered to be holy, fervently revered by literally billions of people (the faithful) …has been a battleground for various faiths, tribes, outside empires (Roman, Ottoman, British), and more recently, between regional states / nations and nascent states in formation.
Leaders of powerful nations watch or involved in the ongoing efforts to bring peace to the Holy Land and to settle the conflict that has haunted the Holy Land for the past 60+ years. The Palestinian population seeks to create their own state, and the US and other nations have encouraged a “two-state” solution (the State of Israel and a new State of Palestine).
Of course, this is a complicated corner of the world. The State of Israel is the thriving democracy in the midst of numerous failed states in the region, or states now or previously ruled by monarchies or despots. And the State of Israel for all of its years since founding the United States and Israel have been allies.
In the case of the MacBride Principles campaign for fair employment in Northern Ireland’s 6 countries (considered part of the United Kingdom), the UK was also a long-time American ally — but in no way did the MacBride Principles campaign vitiate the integrity of the Principles or the reasonableness of the request, the organizers point out. The campaign never addressed the partition of Ireland, Irish independence, and other thorny political issues.
Similarly, the Holy Land Principles organizers take no position on the issues of one state, two states, refugees, settlements, United Nations resolutions, or issues beyond fair employment practices of US companies doing business in Israel and Palestine. These are for other parties to address.
The 2014 Campaign Addresses Elements of Holy Land Social Justice Issues – With the MacBride Principles as Model
The campaign organizers point out there were discrimination issues in the six counties of Northern Ireland where the Roman Catholic minority was not being treated fairly by the Protestant majority. The recent “Troubles” began in the late 1960s and civil unrest and strife continued on to the “Good Friday Agreement” brokered by the US in 1998.
Investors and social justice advocates in the USA created the MacBride Principles, a corporate code of conduct for US companies doing business in Northern Ireland and the standards for actions by the US Congress.
The “Easter” agreement ended the civil war between the United Kingdom’s security forces and Irish political loyalists and armed paramilitary forces (more than 3,500 people died during the conflict).
After years of campaigning, American companies signed on to the MacBride Principles for their Northern Ireland operations.
In a December 1997 post on the Human Rights Library of the University of Minnesota, Father Sean McManus, President of the Irish National Caucus, explained: “…there are 80 publicly-traded US companies in Northern Ireland and many, because of the systematic practice and endemic nature of anti-Catholic discrimination [the companies] are subsidizing discrimination…”
At that writing 44 US companies agreed to “make all lawful efforts to implement the fair employment practices embodied in the MacBride Principles for their Northern Ireland operations.” The list of those companies and more information is at: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/links/macbride.html
A total of 116 companies have to date signed on to the MacBride Principles — the reference materials can be found on the web site: www.HolyLandPrinciples.org.
Father Sean McManus — the same man who launched the MacBride Principles on November 4, 1984 –is also President of the Holy Land Principles (based in Washington, DC) and is still President of the Irish National Caucus. He is calling on US SRI investors to support the “just, moderate and eminently reasonable Holy Land Principles.”
The Principles, he points out, do not call for quotas, reverse discrimination, dis-investment, or boycotts. (All of these strategies are hugely unpopular among certain stakeholders.) They do call for fair employment by American companies. He describes the Principles as pro-Jewish, pro-Palestinian, pro-company.
Father McManus points out that the Holy Land Principles are based on the success of the MacBride Principles — “now universally regarded as having played a most effective role in promoting equality, justice and peace in Northern Ireland.”
To date, Father McManus reports that one US company has signed on to the Holy Land Principles: Oxygen Biotherapeutics. OXBT is a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing a portfolio of products for the critical care market. In September the Company received shareholder approval to change the Company name to Tenax Therapeutics, Inc.
Is Father McManus discouraged by slow progress? No – he explains that it took five years for the first US company to sign the McBride Principles. He adds: “Holy Land Principles is in it for the long haul. We know the companies will be persuaded sooner or later to sign the Principles. We just urge them to do it sooner rather than later and be on the right side of history, which dictates that American principles should follow American investment.”
By Father McManus’s count, there are 546 American companies operating in the Holy Land; a complete list he assembled is available at: HolyLandPrinciples.org
The MacBride Principles has had positive, long-term effect. In November, New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli visited Northern Ireland and spoke with Irish News. The newspaper reported that the recently re-elected comptroller (who is sole trustee of the US$180 billion state pension fund) pointed out that the NYS Common Fund had investment capital set aside for Northern Ireland. It is important for the political institutions of Northern Ireland to remain stable to ensure the north is attractive to investors.”
MacBride Luminaries: During the campaign to have companies adopt the MacBride Principles, individuals and jurisdictions voicing support included President Bill Clinton; US Senator Bob Dole; NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani; NYS Governor Mario Cuomo; Boston Mayor Raymond Flynn (later, ambassador to the Vatican); and 16 states passing MacBride legislation (including New York).
Quo Vadis, Holy Land Principles?
Going forward into the 2015 proxy season we will see where and how the Holy Land Principles may make an impact in the American corporate sector, and in the capital markets. This is a new campaign seeking to gain traction, characterized as a “moral appeal” by the Father McManus and the campaign managers.
Intel is in focus and the organizers have created a 29-page pamphlet: “Why Intel Should Sign the Holy Land Principles.” Similar reports have been prepared about GE and Corning. Activist investor Harrington Investors has filed a resolution with Intel for the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders; similar resolutions are filed at GE and Corning. The campaign organizers are inviting voting support by other investors.
Intel, says Father McManus, has 10,000 employees and billions of dollars invested in the Holy Land.
On a positive note, Father McManus points out that the “Intel and the 546 US companies have certain fair employment guidelines already in place…but with the MacBride Principles [experience] it was not until the companies sign on that real progress was made in discrimination…:
It’s interesting to speculate: Will US companies agreeing to the Holy Land Principles help to make a difference in debate about the future peace efforts in the region? Time will tell; what is immediately important to the US companies as they consider the invitation to sign on to the Principles: What happens if they (a) sign on or (b) ignore or brush off the request to agree to this new code of conduct?
American CEOs and boards of at least 546 companies no doubt will be watching the progress of the Holy Land Principles every closely. As will the investment community, and issue advocates, keeping in mind the American social justice campaigns in South Africa and Northern Ireland that changed the course of history.